<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Be careful of fiddling with the inflation figures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dofonline.co.uk/blogs/the-edge/interest-rates/fiddling-with-the-inflation-figures-1155574/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dofonline.co.uk/blogs/the-edge/interest-rates/fiddling-with-the-inflation-figures-1155574/</link>
	<description>Richard Northedge takes on corporate finance</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 06:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Tremain</title>
		<link>http://dofonline.co.uk/blogs/the-edge/interest-rates/fiddling-with-the-inflation-figures-1155574/#comment-15432</link>
		<dc:creator>David Tremain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dofonline.co.uk/blogs/the-edge/?p=483#comment-15432</guid>
		<description>The 2010 retail prices index CAN be compared with previous years. Price
indices always use a link-month, where both the old and new basket of goods
are collected. The index figure given by the new basket is then
chain-linked onto the the old basket, to give a continuous measure which
can easily be compare year on year. It's all basic index number theory, which perhaps the author should have checked before posting. Also, the RPI has NOT been retrospectively revised, it is a complete
fallacy to say that is has. The new methods will only affect the calculations going forwards. Again, probably something the author should have checked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 2010 retail prices index CAN be compared with previous years. Price<br />
indices always use a link-month, where both the old and new basket of goods<br />
are collected. The index figure given by the new basket is then<br />
chain-linked onto the the old basket, to give a continuous measure which<br />
can easily be compare year on year. It&#8217;s all basic index number theory, which perhaps the author should have checked before posting. Also, the RPI has NOT been retrospectively revised, it is a complete<br />
fallacy to say that is has. The new methods will only affect the calculations going forwards. Again, probably something the author should have checked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

