<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Private individuals (and companies) are entitled to their privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dofonline.co.uk/blogs/the-edge/government/hounours-34543543/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dofonline.co.uk/blogs/the-edge/government/hounours-34543543/</link>
	<description>Richard Northedge takes on corporate finance</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 06:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Youngman</title>
		<link>http://dofonline.co.uk/blogs/the-edge/government/hounours-34543543/#comment-52619</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Youngman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 21:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dofonline.co.uk/blogs/the-edge/?p=852#comment-52619</guid>
		<description>I was an FOI Officer for 20 years. There is nothing dangerous about FOI. The danger lies in people who believe the role of government and the public service is to hide things from the general public.

In the case in question, the names should have been withheld on the grounds of personal information. If there are aspects of the legislation that need to be adjusted, then that is the answer. The answer is not to remove legislation that is designed to give people the right to see how government and the public service work and make both of them accountable to the people.

Phillip Youngman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was an FOI Officer for 20 years. There is nothing dangerous about FOI. The danger lies in people who believe the role of government and the public service is to hide things from the general public.</p>
<p>In the case in question, the names should have been withheld on the grounds of personal information. If there are aspects of the legislation that need to be adjusted, then that is the answer. The answer is not to remove legislation that is designed to give people the right to see how government and the public service work and make both of them accountable to the people.</p>
<p>Phillip Youngman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

