<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We should question how we finance healthcare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dofonline.co.uk/blogs/the-edge/economics/finance-healthcare-nhs-45598544/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dofonline.co.uk/blogs/the-edge/economics/finance-healthcare-nhs-45598544/</link>
	<description>Richard Northedge takes on corporate finance</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 05:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David R</title>
		<link>http://dofonline.co.uk/blogs/the-edge/economics/finance-healthcare-nhs-45598544/#comment-9562</link>
		<dc:creator>David R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dofonline.co.uk/blogs/the-edge/?p=374#comment-9562</guid>
		<description>Well, lord knows the UK system is far from perfect - but it manages to deliver a higher life expectancy than the american system, at half the cost.   

Without some of the clumsy market-oriented meddling - or should that be short-termist soundbite-oriented meddling - from politicians, the UK system might even be better than that of France, Spain, Germany, or Japan.  As it is we have a system that is mostly good, occasionally bad, sometimes brilliant.

Healthcare in the USA is now gobbling so much of the country's GDP - 16% and rising - that the health and insurance sector is a massive vested interest obstucting any efforts to improve outcomes, value for money, and social justice.  

15% to 20% of americans get minimal healthcare, but they are now more or less balanced by 15% to 20% of americans whose livelihoods depend on the current expensive, bloated, and bureaucratic system of insurance based provision.  

I wish president Obama the best of luck in his endeavours to deliver better healthcare to his fellow Americans, he is taking on a vested interest group on a par with big oil or big tobacco.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, lord knows the UK system is far from perfect - but it manages to deliver a higher life expectancy than the american system, at half the cost.   </p>
<p>Without some of the clumsy market-oriented meddling - or should that be short-termist soundbite-oriented meddling - from politicians, the UK system might even be better than that of France, Spain, Germany, or Japan.  As it is we have a system that is mostly good, occasionally bad, sometimes brilliant.</p>
<p>Healthcare in the USA is now gobbling so much of the country&#8217;s GDP - 16% and rising - that the health and insurance sector is a massive vested interest obstucting any efforts to improve outcomes, value for money, and social justice.  </p>
<p>15% to 20% of americans get minimal healthcare, but they are now more or less balanced by 15% to 20% of americans whose livelihoods depend on the current expensive, bloated, and bureaucratic system of insurance based provision.  </p>
<p>I wish president Obama the best of luck in his endeavours to deliver better healthcare to his fellow Americans, he is taking on a vested interest group on a par with big oil or big tobacco.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

