<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EC penalises Microsoft for its success</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dofonline.co.uk/blogs/the-edge/business/ec-penalises-microsoft-for-its-success2654/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dofonline.co.uk/blogs/the-edge/business/ec-penalises-microsoft-for-its-success2654/</link>
	<description>Richard Northedge takes on corporate finance</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 04:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dumpao</title>
		<link>http://dofonline.co.uk/blogs/the-edge/business/ec-penalises-microsoft-for-its-success2654/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>dumpao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dofonline.co.uk/blogs/?p=113#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Patents makes a mockery of competition law.

This is what is happening with the EU antitrust case.

Microsoft is appealing the EC decision:

"Microsoft argues that the licensing terms demanded by the EC violate its intellectual property rights."

You can bet they are claiming that Open Source competitors have to pay when commercial services are involved.

That is the only thing Microsoft is interested in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patents makes a mockery of competition law.</p>
<p>This is what is happening with the EU antitrust case.</p>
<p>Microsoft is appealing the EC decision:</p>
<p>&#8220;Microsoft argues that the licensing terms demanded by the EC violate its intellectual property rights.&#8221;</p>
<p>You can bet they are claiming that Open Source competitors have to pay when commercial services are involved.</p>
<p>That is the only thing Microsoft is interested in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

