<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RBS investors right to sue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dofonline.co.uk/blogs/the-edge/banks/rbs-investors-55822214/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dofonline.co.uk/blogs/the-edge/banks/rbs-investors-55822214/</link>
	<description>Richard Northedge takes on corporate finance</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 03:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Manchester</title>
		<link>http://dofonline.co.uk/blogs/the-edge/banks/rbs-investors-55822214/#comment-10606</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Manchester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dofonline.co.uk/blogs/the-edge/?p=405#comment-10606</guid>
		<description>Well actually I would have preferred to loose all the money that I had in the bank at the time of the original offer than be suckered into loosing far more up until now.  Soon there will be little or no RBS left in private hands so actually it might as well have been nationalised in April 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well actually I would have preferred to loose all the money that I had in the bank at the time of the original offer than be suckered into loosing far more up until now.  Soon there will be little or no RBS left in private hands so actually it might as well have been nationalised in April 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hannah Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://dofonline.co.uk/blogs/the-edge/banks/rbs-investors-55822214/#comment-10600</link>
		<dc:creator>Hannah Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dofonline.co.uk/blogs/the-edge/?p=405#comment-10600</guid>
		<description>When the rights issue for shares at 31.75 was presented in March 2009 (not January) the share price on the closing date for the offer was 25.1p so shareholders were not wrong to reject the offer as they could buy the shares for cheaper than was being offered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the rights issue for shares at 31.75 was presented in March 2009 (not January) the share price on the closing date for the offer was 25.1p so shareholders were not wrong to reject the offer as they could buy the shares for cheaper than was being offered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

